Pgp8.1
((travelling till abt 31st, so more responses may be late ))
((travelling till abt 31st, so more responses may be late ))
india is a concept that has to be accepted swallowed with caution as it enables imperial control and exploitation even in the present ... history economics of respected barun de and sau did not drill through to the devices used in continued enslavement of the world including india . .. i say this despite the easy encomiums showered by us on these two . I am ready to continue to defend my observations here , but would be easier in a smaller discussion .. I think most of us have been too busy earning bread for our families to have individually wrap our mind s to study available literature on this , including impressive lessons in history from a class fellow who prefers anonymity .
Interestingly , (( during the 2008 stock market crash in the West and the 20 Trillion $ bailout that even went to non US banks , )) i was keen to understand how the WSR Wall Street Regime (google Gowan s article on this ) manages to pay for its wars when every year last 30 years they have fiscal deficit as well as Foreign exchange imbalance ... and typical of my bourgeois middle class background values neediness greed .. i wanted to understyand their system to enable me to exploit use for my immediate money making ---thus absolute focus and sharp search of available literature was needed to learn to beat the wsr at their own game !! ..... this para written with some liberty in this forum of classfellows !!
PART 1]
[Good afternoon, Evgeny. Could you comment on this please. Non-commercial organizations appeared, which were sponsored from abroad and engaged in politics. You were the one who introduced the bill on Foreign Agents. Fine – it was accepted. Next came the Undesirable Organizations – a slightly different form of ownership. Then we started tackling them too. But the enemy is alert, and devises new forms: free bloggers, journalistic investigations sponsored by Khodorkovsky, apportioning up to 20 million for each of them. How shall we tackle this? The enemy’s imagination is just endless.]
This is how things are. Our imagination has always been endless too, and the enemy’s, because there is a contest ongoing, in which we are always coming up with different things. Now we’re talking about survival on Planet Earth – for the colonialist U.S. empire or for Russia as a defensive nation in this case. Of course there will always be new ideas. Remember in St.Petersburg there was a meeting of the US agents and Secretary of State Clinton, as she was then, who said, “we’ll think of something”, after she had gathered her agents. That was the very time of the law which I was one of the authors of: the law on Foreign Agents – meaning organizations. She said: don’t worry, we’ll come up with something to circumvent Russia’s laws which are impeding you from working on the elimination of Russia for our money. That’s what Hillary Clinton said at the meeting in St.Petersburg. No-one is particularly concealing this. And they did come up with methods. You mentioned 1, 2, 3 of them. I’m sure there are hundreds. There are people hired to think through these matters, moreover specialists of Orange Invasions. For us there can be only one idea – “taking Berlin”. Hitler, the Gestapo, Goebbels, whoever – they came up with millions of ideas on how to defeat the Soviet Union. In detail: which village to seize – if we’re talking about the Wehrmacht, which agents to capture, whom to assassinate – Stalin, for example. Their job was to come up with various options. How best to construct the propaganda. But once Berlin was taken, all of these ideas ended. For us “Berlin” means restoration of our country, every inch of it. Restoration of the nation automatically means that the victory is complete. Like in sport, they’re always thinking of ideas, then the Olympic Games take place, someone wins, the medal is presented, then the thinking ends. After the fight you don’t shake your fists, so to speak. So it is here too. You will keep experiencing this until you make up your mind about your goals. Our goal is the restoration and defense of the historic Russian statehood. Once we achieve that goal – that of our grandfathers: “Freedom irrespective of your fatherland” – you remember? – we achieve the goal, restore our territory, if necessary suppress the nidus of aggression – which back in the day was in Berlin, in Romania, in Hungary – it was not only Hitler attacking Russia. We crushed them, eliminated them, restored our border. After that the machinations stopped for 50 years. Although there was the Cuban Missile Crisis, but by then it was from a different configuration, because our allies started trying to seize the initiative against Russia. The Cuban Missile Crisis likewise booted them more or less into balance. After the Cuban Missile Crisis the U.S. recognized the parity with the Soviet Union in the contest and started negotiating as equals. Until then they just did whatever they considered necessary. It’s the very same thing now. Russia’s sovereignty has to be restored, her borders, and after that these bloggers can be ignored. Putin has gotten stronger within United Russia (party). Whereas I was saying 2-3 years ago that the pro-Putin camp in United Russia was about 10% – in the parliamentary bloc – now I say it’s up to half of them. Could be more or less, because some of them are still to be “battle-tested”, as the saying goes. But it’s about half of them. From 10% to 50% – obviously it’s a strengthening. All of us, thanks to the support of Putin, have turned the Duma pro-Putin, which doesn’t mean it will violate the Constitution. It means that Putin’s wielded influence over the Duma is strengthened, i.e. he can push through more of his bills than previously, and they could be tougher ones. At the same time, a balance of power has formed ahead of the decisive constitutional reform. But you have to understand that the struggle is intensifying. It’s like when you’re fighting a war: one victorious engagement doesn’t mean you won the war. It means that the next confrontation demands even more experience and mobilization, and so it continues. Only after hundreds of battles do you reach Berlin. Today we have won a very important, maybe a key battle – the election. But it doesn’t mean that everything is alright, you can all go home. It means we have opened the way for a victorious offensive. We have won the defensive war – consider it the Battle of Moscow, or the Battle of Stalingrad – the defensive part. Now the offensive is underway. You see how the rhetoric has suddenly sharpened on the international scene, Putin’s rhetoric has sharpened, the purge at the Central Bank has begun, purges have begun in the banking system. But let’s consider one simple fact. We have 80 banks, half of which have been closed, and people have been put in jail. What is going on? When in our history was there something like this? I’ll tell you when – during the disenfranchisement of the kulaks ( _ =land-owners opposing collectivization _ ), although that was considered a negative, when a whole class – for the construction of a modern Russia it was necessary to eliminate the colonialist Russia. Excuse the brutal term, ’cause sometimes bankers come to me complaining. I’ll tell you, for about a year the oligarchs will be coming and complaining. Because in order to build the _ kolhoz _ (=collective farms), the ( _ land-owning _ ) kulak had to be eliminated. It was a bad idea, but I’m just describing a technology: taking away the two cows from the kulak, and with those two, plus another 2 + 2 + 2, assembling a collective farm. You can’t make a _ kolhoz _ without eliminating the _ kulak _ . Obviously the kulak will resist, cry, bicker, sting. Will join the partisan army, as happened in Tambov. Putin has launched the political process of the national liberation movement, after commencing the assault on the main outpost of U.S. occupying power in Russia – the oligarchs, starting from the banker flank of the oligarchic governance. Unlike the oligarchs, the bankers not only are pro-U.S., pro-occupier, they are even officially subordinated to the U.S. All banks in Russia – maybe there is an exception, I don’t know – but all banks in Russia simultaneously are resident agents for the US taxation agency. There are officials in Washington monitoring what banks there are in Russia and what they are doing, because it’s their subordinates: They have subordinates via the IMF and the Central Bank, and directly all of Russia’s banks. These are the _ kulaks _ again, in terms of the U.S. system of communication, governance. It’s their immediate workers, quite simply. Workers for the U.S. government – that’s our banks, from the perspective of their legal status, formally speaking. So when Putin attacked the banks, and is eliminating half the banks, that in essence means eliminating the system. The other half are hiding somewhere in their basements, knowing they’ll be gotten to as well. If a kulak was _ dekulakized _ (disenfranchised) next door, it means they’ll be coming to the next house too, if they have two cows too. Same here – it’s the _ dekulakization _ process. This is an irreversible process that Putin has started. The reversibility in the process was the complete elimination of us and all of Russia. He has launched an irreversible process, in the context of which was our victory in the election. You see: Immortal Regiment (memorial march), election, referendum. This is the path down which Putin is taking Russia. It’s the path of NOD – the national liberation movement. The key thing is the decision by the people. The people decided to betray their country in 1991: personally signed up to the occupier’s Constitution, by which the USSR was dissolved and the earlier decision of the people was annulled – the vote for preservation of the USSR. In the Constitution of the Russian Federation, which was immediately distributed to all Deputies, there isn’t a word from 1993 about the existence of the USSR. The people voted for dissolution of the USSR, in case anyone hasn’t understood. In the same way, the people have to change their mind, enter into the political battle for national liberation, especially under the influence of this war. We understand that the falling standard of living, the social disaster that is happening to many people today, these are elements of military actions, which should give people the answer – you’re enduring this, because you were a participant when your country got eliminated. It’s a consequence of defeat in war, i.e. you get deprived of your wages, pension, etc. This has to be clearly understood. Your freedom, your life, restoration, depend on victory in this war involving the whole of your country. Sitting waiting for some old guys who are Deputies in the Duma to decide something is a bad idea, which will not lead to a result.
[Good afternoon, Evgeny. Could you comment on this please. Non-commercial organizations appeared, which were sponsored from abroad and engaged in politics. You were the one who introduced the bill on Foreign Agents. Fine – it was accepted. Next came the Undesirable Organizations – a slightly different form of ownership. Then we started tackling them too. But the enemy is alert, and devises new forms: free bloggers, journalistic investigations sponsored by Khodorkovsky, apportioning up to 20 million for each of them. How shall we tackle this? The enemy’s imagination is just endless.]
This is how things are. Our imagination has always been endless too, and the enemy’s, because there is a contest ongoing, in which we are always coming up with different things. Now we’re talking about survival on Planet Earth – for the colonialist U.S. empire or for Russia as a defensive nation in this case. Of course there will always be new ideas. Remember in St.Petersburg there was a meeting of the US agents and Secretary of State Clinton, as she was then, who said, “we’ll think of something”, after she had gathered her agents. That was the very time of the law which I was one of the authors of: the law on Foreign Agents – meaning organizations. She said: don’t worry, we’ll come up with something to circumvent Russia’s laws which are impeding you from working on the elimination of Russia for our money. That’s what Hillary Clinton said at the meeting in St.Petersburg. No-one is particularly concealing this. And they did come up with methods. You mentioned 1, 2, 3 of them. I’m sure there are hundreds. There are people hired to think through these matters, moreover specialists of Orange Invasions. For us there can be only one idea – “taking Berlin”. Hitler, the Gestapo, Goebbels, whoever – they came up with millions of ideas on how to defeat the Soviet Union. In detail: which village to seize – if we’re talking about the Wehrmacht, which agents to capture, whom to assassinate – Stalin, for example. Their job was to come up with various options. How best to construct the propaganda. But once Berlin was taken, all of these ideas ended. For us “Berlin” means restoration of our country, every inch of it. Restoration of the nation automatically means that the victory is complete. Like in sport, they’re always thinking of ideas, then the Olympic Games take place, someone wins, the medal is presented, then the thinking ends. After the fight you don’t shake your fists, so to speak. So it is here too. You will keep experiencing this until you make up your mind about your goals. Our goal is the restoration and defense of the historic Russian statehood. Once we achieve that goal – that of our grandfathers: “Freedom irrespective of your fatherland” – you remember? – we achieve the goal, restore our territory, if necessary suppress the nidus of aggression – which back in the day was in Berlin, in Romania, in Hungary – it was not only Hitler attacking Russia. We crushed them, eliminated them, restored our border. After that the machinations stopped for 50 years. Although there was the Cuban Missile Crisis, but by then it was from a different configuration, because our allies started trying to seize the initiative against Russia. The Cuban Missile Crisis likewise booted them more or less into balance. After the Cuban Missile Crisis the U.S. recognized the parity with the Soviet Union in the contest and started negotiating as equals. Until then they just did whatever they considered necessary. It’s the very same thing now. Russia’s sovereignty has to be restored, her borders, and after that these bloggers can be ignored. Putin has gotten stronger within United Russia (party). Whereas I was saying 2-3 years ago that the pro-Putin camp in United Russia was about 10% – in the parliamentary bloc – now I say it’s up to half of them. Could be more or less, because some of them are still to be “battle-tested”, as the saying goes. But it’s about half of them. From 10% to 50% – obviously it’s a strengthening. All of us, thanks to the support of Putin, have turned the Duma pro-Putin, which doesn’t mean it will violate the Constitution. It means that Putin’s wielded influence over the Duma is strengthened, i.e. he can push through more of his bills than previously, and they could be tougher ones. At the same time, a balance of power has formed ahead of the decisive constitutional reform. But you have to understand that the struggle is intensifying. It’s like when you’re fighting a war: one victorious engagement doesn’t mean you won the war. It means that the next confrontation demands even more experience and mobilization, and so it continues. Only after hundreds of battles do you reach Berlin. Today we have won a very important, maybe a key battle – the election. But it doesn’t mean that everything is alright, you can all go home. It means we have opened the way for a victorious offensive. We have won the defensive war – consider it the Battle of Moscow, or the Battle of Stalingrad – the defensive part. Now the offensive is underway. You see how the rhetoric has suddenly sharpened on the international scene, Putin’s rhetoric has sharpened, the purge at the Central Bank has begun, purges have begun in the banking system. But let’s consider one simple fact. We have 80 banks, half of which have been closed, and people have been put in jail. What is going on? When in our history was there something like this? I’ll tell you when – during the disenfranchisement of the kulaks ( _ =land-owners opposing collectivization _ ), although that was considered a negative, when a whole class – for the construction of a modern Russia it was necessary to eliminate the colonialist Russia. Excuse the brutal term, ’cause sometimes bankers come to me complaining. I’ll tell you, for about a year the oligarchs will be coming and complaining. Because in order to build the _ kolhoz _ (=collective farms), the ( _ land-owning _ ) kulak had to be eliminated. It was a bad idea, but I’m just describing a technology: taking away the two cows from the kulak, and with those two, plus another 2 + 2 + 2, assembling a collective farm. You can’t make a _ kolhoz _ without eliminating the _ kulak _ . Obviously the kulak will resist, cry, bicker, sting. Will join the partisan army, as happened in Tambov. Putin has launched the political process of the national liberation movement, after commencing the assault on the main outpost of U.S. occupying power in Russia – the oligarchs, starting from the banker flank of the oligarchic governance. Unlike the oligarchs, the bankers not only are pro-U.S., pro-occupier, they are even officially subordinated to the U.S. All banks in Russia – maybe there is an exception, I don’t know – but all banks in Russia simultaneously are resident agents for the US taxation agency. There are officials in Washington monitoring what banks there are in Russia and what they are doing, because it’s their subordinates: They have subordinates via the IMF and the Central Bank, and directly all of Russia’s banks. These are the _ kulaks _ again, in terms of the U.S. system of communication, governance. It’s their immediate workers, quite simply. Workers for the U.S. government – that’s our banks, from the perspective of their legal status, formally speaking. So when Putin attacked the banks, and is eliminating half the banks, that in essence means eliminating the system. The other half are hiding somewhere in their basements, knowing they’ll be gotten to as well. If a kulak was _ dekulakized _ (disenfranchised) next door, it means they’ll be coming to the next house too, if they have two cows too. Same here – it’s the _ dekulakization _ process. This is an irreversible process that Putin has started. The reversibility in the process was the complete elimination of us and all of Russia. He has launched an irreversible process, in the context of which was our victory in the election. You see: Immortal Regiment (memorial march), election, referendum. This is the path down which Putin is taking Russia. It’s the path of NOD – the national liberation movement. The key thing is the decision by the people. The people decided to betray their country in 1991: personally signed up to the occupier’s Constitution, by which the USSR was dissolved and the earlier decision of the people was annulled – the vote for preservation of the USSR. In the Constitution of the Russian Federation, which was immediately distributed to all Deputies, there isn’t a word from 1993 about the existence of the USSR. The people voted for dissolution of the USSR, in case anyone hasn’t understood. In the same way, the people have to change their mind, enter into the political battle for national liberation, especially under the influence of this war. We understand that the falling standard of living, the social disaster that is happening to many people today, these are elements of military actions, which should give people the answer – you’re enduring this, because you were a participant when your country got eliminated. It’s a consequence of defeat in war, i.e. you get deprived of your wages, pension, etc. This has to be clearly understood. Your freedom, your life, restoration, depend on victory in this war involving the whole of your country. Sitting waiting for some old guys who are Deputies in the Duma to decide something is a bad idea, which will not lead to a result.
Show less
REPLY
2
[PART 2]
[Evgeny, could there be _ non-enforced _ disenfranchisement, done voluntarily? What do these oligarchs and bankers have to do in order to not get shut down?]
Let’s call things by their proper names. What we are talking about is the struggle for power. What is the national liberation movement? It’s the struggle for power, dammit – national power. What is a banker – economic power. What is going on here? It’s the elimination of U.S. power in the Russian economy. How could there be any stroking of their belly? What are you talking about? It’s a matter of power. People in those banks today, under pressure from Putin, are going to jail, retreating, emigrating. We calculated: “Bailing out” one bank, as it is politely called, with money from the Central Bank, costs several times more than what that bank would bring in for Russia and for its depositors as a result of the bail-out. The state pays this process – well, not the state, but the Central Bank. Massive amounts too. Because the issue of power is more important than money. There is a power struggle taking place, in case anyone hasn’t noticed. This power struggle that is happening in Russia via a blow to the banks is a vector towards the oligarchs. The oligarchs are the main focus of the battle preparation. The Battle of Borodino, the main battle of the war, is the battle for the oligarchs, for de-offshoring, as V.V.Putin calls it, for nationalization of the economy, for the oligarchs – which means entrepreneurs. “Oligarchs” means foreign governance, while “entrepreneurs” means our own. The main battle will be for this class, because they are the ones with real economic power. They are the ones placing orders for political parties, elections, they were the ones who pushed through the single-member electoral districts and gubernatorial elections – they did all of that. Or rather the U.S. did it, through their lines of communication. Therefore, they will be the main object of the battle. Right now there are deadly skirmishes for fortification of the bridgehead called the banking system, in which Putin has eliminated half of the enemies – meaning economically, politically, of course. Some have surrendered, some have retreated, some have become afraid. You can see it’s all being done politely – there is no bankers’ uprising. But an uprising of the kulaks – there was.
[Evgeny, just yesterday the activities of Deloitte & Touche were halted for one month (U.S. accountancy firm). Moreover, it happened at the moment when contracts for the year ahead were being agreed. What does this tell us – it this too a victory for NOD?]
Of course. Deloitte & Touche monitors the economics agencies in Russia. And obviously, during this month, thanks to the blow delivered by NOD-supporter Bastrykin (head of Investigative Committee), the most powerful occupying system of the U.S. in Russia, which controls the economic course, is paralyzed. This is the system that should have reacted to Putin’s blow to the banks. This is called the paralyzed enemy headquarters – during the period for companies to agree contracts. The $2 billion that foreign consultancy costs us, some of which was going to them, they won’t get. Our own won’t get it either, because state ideology is forbidden in our country. Some may get a trivial amount. But at least the most significant enemy has been dislodged. But we are not yet ready to seize that power. It’s not enough to strip away power, you have to seize it, and permeate it with administrative substance. We’re not ready yet to fill it out with administration. But I know that negotiations are taking place with specialists in that company about their moving from the U.S. side to the Russian side.
[They are all Russians, so why not?]
Russians or Russians – they weren’t working just for the sake of it. The Americans are not idiots either. Because they now have their cottages in London and New York, families are there, they were selected, got their education there certainly. You can’t take every one of them. There is a term for that. The Bolsheviks took people, back in the day, but there had to be monitoring of every one of them. Which is what we have observed. Obviously we should take some of them, because we don’t have our own people. We’ve only just begun to train our own.
[By the way, you mentioned family abroad. Some news came out, which was very quickly denied out of the Kremlin. Maybe it was a leak.]
It wasn’t denied. You mean Peskov? Peskov said I don’t know anything about that. He didn’t say there’s no such thing.
[In the media they were implying it was denied.]
You see the propaganda machinery of the media. Obviously it’s an attack. I’ll tell you. This news is about the fact that civil servants and deputies cannot be civil servants and deputies if their family is overseas, for example children in school. We proposed to introduce this into law a long time ago under a NOD bill. The bill didn’t pass, but de facto Putin is implementing this policy. You understand whose instruction this was. Peskov said: I know nothing about it. I don’t know, and that’s all. Obviously so as not to have to answer in detail on the matter. If he had responded “I know”, then he would have had to explain himself. He would have had to say that Russia is under occupation. Imagine if Peskov would have said, “ _ Russia is under occupation, and in order to reduce the occupier’s pressure, we have to... _ ” That would be impossible, right? I’m the only one who can say that. In this case not only me, of course – I was joking a bit. But he obviously can’t say this. That’s why he said “I know nothing”. Our media changed it into a denial by him. He denied nothing. In the election a purge took place of Deputies in the Duma with family overseas. I just know that. A specific purge took place. Obviously it was a political instruction. I don’t know whose, but it was implemented. There were even Deputies – wealthy ones – who switched bloc, because they were unable to fulfil the conditions for remaining in United Russia. These things happened. It’s clear there are purges taking place in the bureaucracy. Civil servants are being purged. It’s easier to do there than with the Deputies. Civil servants are being purged who have vulnerabilities – I’m explaining why this is being done – vulnerabilities in relation to the U.S. The battle is raging on all fronts. In case anyone hasn’t understood, I’ll draw it. So this was our level (down here). Then came the victory as a result of the election, and so on. This is what we need to do today. And this goes up to the ceiling – your camera won’t show it. We are on the eve of a radical transformation. Like the transformation of 1991 and 1993, when the country changed completely – in terms of the country’s internal system: people, structure, authority, names of institutions – for those who remember that time. Now the reverse process is underway. It will be a wholesale replacement of the system. Obviously not all at once, but in stages, according to the increase in Putin’s strength. Why is it we are cursing Putin’s opponents, like Kasyanov, Nemtsov, Starikov, that they don’t give him the strength for this. That’s the issue. We are on the verge of a gigantic transformation of revolutionary scale. Just so people understand.
[Evgeny, could there be _ non-enforced _ disenfranchisement, done voluntarily? What do these oligarchs and bankers have to do in order to not get shut down?]
Let’s call things by their proper names. What we are talking about is the struggle for power. What is the national liberation movement? It’s the struggle for power, dammit – national power. What is a banker – economic power. What is going on here? It’s the elimination of U.S. power in the Russian economy. How could there be any stroking of their belly? What are you talking about? It’s a matter of power. People in those banks today, under pressure from Putin, are going to jail, retreating, emigrating. We calculated: “Bailing out” one bank, as it is politely called, with money from the Central Bank, costs several times more than what that bank would bring in for Russia and for its depositors as a result of the bail-out. The state pays this process – well, not the state, but the Central Bank. Massive amounts too. Because the issue of power is more important than money. There is a power struggle taking place, in case anyone hasn’t noticed. This power struggle that is happening in Russia via a blow to the banks is a vector towards the oligarchs. The oligarchs are the main focus of the battle preparation. The Battle of Borodino, the main battle of the war, is the battle for the oligarchs, for de-offshoring, as V.V.Putin calls it, for nationalization of the economy, for the oligarchs – which means entrepreneurs. “Oligarchs” means foreign governance, while “entrepreneurs” means our own. The main battle will be for this class, because they are the ones with real economic power. They are the ones placing orders for political parties, elections, they were the ones who pushed through the single-member electoral districts and gubernatorial elections – they did all of that. Or rather the U.S. did it, through their lines of communication. Therefore, they will be the main object of the battle. Right now there are deadly skirmishes for fortification of the bridgehead called the banking system, in which Putin has eliminated half of the enemies – meaning economically, politically, of course. Some have surrendered, some have retreated, some have become afraid. You can see it’s all being done politely – there is no bankers’ uprising. But an uprising of the kulaks – there was.
[Evgeny, just yesterday the activities of Deloitte & Touche were halted for one month (U.S. accountancy firm). Moreover, it happened at the moment when contracts for the year ahead were being agreed. What does this tell us – it this too a victory for NOD?]
Of course. Deloitte & Touche monitors the economics agencies in Russia. And obviously, during this month, thanks to the blow delivered by NOD-supporter Bastrykin (head of Investigative Committee), the most powerful occupying system of the U.S. in Russia, which controls the economic course, is paralyzed. This is the system that should have reacted to Putin’s blow to the banks. This is called the paralyzed enemy headquarters – during the period for companies to agree contracts. The $2 billion that foreign consultancy costs us, some of which was going to them, they won’t get. Our own won’t get it either, because state ideology is forbidden in our country. Some may get a trivial amount. But at least the most significant enemy has been dislodged. But we are not yet ready to seize that power. It’s not enough to strip away power, you have to seize it, and permeate it with administrative substance. We’re not ready yet to fill it out with administration. But I know that negotiations are taking place with specialists in that company about their moving from the U.S. side to the Russian side.
[They are all Russians, so why not?]
Russians or Russians – they weren’t working just for the sake of it. The Americans are not idiots either. Because they now have their cottages in London and New York, families are there, they were selected, got their education there certainly. You can’t take every one of them. There is a term for that. The Bolsheviks took people, back in the day, but there had to be monitoring of every one of them. Which is what we have observed. Obviously we should take some of them, because we don’t have our own people. We’ve only just begun to train our own.
[By the way, you mentioned family abroad. Some news came out, which was very quickly denied out of the Kremlin. Maybe it was a leak.]
It wasn’t denied. You mean Peskov? Peskov said I don’t know anything about that. He didn’t say there’s no such thing.
[In the media they were implying it was denied.]
You see the propaganda machinery of the media. Obviously it’s an attack. I’ll tell you. This news is about the fact that civil servants and deputies cannot be civil servants and deputies if their family is overseas, for example children in school. We proposed to introduce this into law a long time ago under a NOD bill. The bill didn’t pass, but de facto Putin is implementing this policy. You understand whose instruction this was. Peskov said: I know nothing about it. I don’t know, and that’s all. Obviously so as not to have to answer in detail on the matter. If he had responded “I know”, then he would have had to explain himself. He would have had to say that Russia is under occupation. Imagine if Peskov would have said, “ _ Russia is under occupation, and in order to reduce the occupier’s pressure, we have to... _ ” That would be impossible, right? I’m the only one who can say that. In this case not only me, of course – I was joking a bit. But he obviously can’t say this. That’s why he said “I know nothing”. Our media changed it into a denial by him. He denied nothing. In the election a purge took place of Deputies in the Duma with family overseas. I just know that. A specific purge took place. Obviously it was a political instruction. I don’t know whose, but it was implemented. There were even Deputies – wealthy ones – who switched bloc, because they were unable to fulfil the conditions for remaining in United Russia. These things happened. It’s clear there are purges taking place in the bureaucracy. Civil servants are being purged. It’s easier to do there than with the Deputies. Civil servants are being purged who have vulnerabilities – I’m explaining why this is being done – vulnerabilities in relation to the U.S. The battle is raging on all fronts. In case anyone hasn’t understood, I’ll draw it. So this was our level (down here). Then came the victory as a result of the election, and so on. This is what we need to do today. And this goes up to the ceiling – your camera won’t show it. We are on the eve of a radical transformation. Like the transformation of 1991 and 1993, when the country changed completely – in terms of the country’s internal system: people, structure, authority, names of institutions – for those who remember that time. Now the reverse process is underway. It will be a wholesale replacement of the system. Obviously not all at once, but in stages, according to the increase in Putin’s strength. Why is it we are cursing Putin’s opponents, like Kasyanov, Nemtsov, Starikov, that they don’t give him the strength for this. That’s the issue. We are on the verge of a gigantic transformation of revolutionary scale. Just so people understand.
Show less
REPLY
2
[PART 1]
[I’d like to start with one of your books – ”Rouble Nationalization”. This work of yours is now more relevant than ever, including for the Republic of Moldova. I’d like to ask you to briefly describe how the mechanisms of the US’ financial influence work on our society, on our countries. And why you think Russia should implement such a fundamental financial ... revolution.]
Good afternoon. Thank you for this opportunity to see my book as a kind of ‘underground publication’. That’s very interesting, pleasant and certainly unexpected. These days, by the hand of fate, I am frequently in Moldova, mostly in Chișinău, of course, but I have also traveled around the country quite a lot. I guess in a few Russian cities they might be offended that I visit Chișinău more often than them. That’s just how it has turned out. As for the global financial system, it’s not just about money and the global economy. The understanding of where money comes from, and who creates it, leads to an understanding of what is happening today in global geo-politics. So it really is important. It concerns not only the Russian Federation, Moldova and other nations. In the whole world it’s constructed almost identically. There are two unequal groups of nations. The first group is headed by the US and includes the EU, Japan, Switzerland, UK. They create money out of thin air. This has to be understood. The emission of these magnificent major “hard currencies” takes place without the backing of anything of value. That’s the first thing to know. Secondly, at a certain point, for some reason, the creation of money was transferred from the state to private central banks. The European Central Bank, the Federal Reserve System, the Bank of England – these are non-state organizations, they are shady private outfits. So we have a strange situation where the state has surrendered one of its main functions – the coining of money, which was metal – gold, silver. Now it’s paper money and virtual ones and zeroes on credit cards, but the essence is unchanged: private bankers create money without the backing of any resources. This gives them unlimited power. It gives them access to an unlimited source of wealth, and, accordingly, power. Because for money one can buy corruptible politicians and (in quotation marks) “independent journalists”. One can establish military bases around the world. If the volume of this money is unlimited, then it would seem to bring unlimited power.
[Alright, Nikolai. In the case of Russia, or Moldova, in terms of the Constitution and legislation, the Central Banks are supposedly state institutions.]
Well, you and we, and most nations – the overwhelming majority, belong to the second group of nations, not having the right to sovereign emission of their own currency by the same principle as the first group of nations does. We are forced to accumulate the money created by these private central banks of the so-called “leading” European powers and the US, in order to emit our national currency. This is the so-called “foreign exchange reserves”. In order to create Lei, Roubles or Mexican Pesos, we have to accumulate in certain reserves those digital ones and zeroes, which others simply print out of thin air.
[You mean, our sovereignty is limited, we cannot have our own financial system?]
Of course not. Moreover, in order to obtain _ their _ digital ones and zeroes, we have to give something away to them – they won’t simply give us this money, we have to sell something on the global market. In this way is created a very unequal exchange – the Western nations hand over primarily money they created out of nothing, and in exchange they receive very concrete resources. In the case of Moldova it could be some agricultural products, since, unfortunately, manufacturing has been destroyed in the post-Soviet period. Part of the nation’s sovereignty, a certain voting power at the UN, a certain political position can all be bought for these unbacked digital ones and zeros. In the case of the Russian Federation, a significant part of our natural wealth is likewise sold for this unbacked western money. And only by receiving this money into the foreign exchange reserves of the Central Bank do we get the right to issue our own money. What we have, in fact, is a feudal system of tribute payments cloaked by the financial system. Without paying the tribute, without handing over some of your national wealth effectively for free, most nations of the world don’t have the right to issue money. Hence the difference in the standard of living. Imagine you’re working honestly in some job, doesn’t matter what. Meanwhile someone else is printing money. Which of you will live better?
[That’s obvious. So it means our central banks are independent of the government, the parliament and the president, but are dependent on external factors.]
Absolutely right. They are incorporated into a certain international structure that was set up as a result of the second world war – the IMF. The central banks are a kind of quasi-governmental structure. If you take the Constitution of Russia, Kazakhstan, Belarus, Moldova or other countries, you’ll see there is a very cunning system of subordination. In reality, what exists under the guise of a quasi-governmental structure is subordination to the International Monetary Fund. Imagine, the state cannot liaise directly with the office that creates money. Any conflict which arises has to be resolved in the Stockholm Arbitration Institute.
[So, institutions within the state, it would seem, have to resolve their disputes overseas?]
Imagine (as an analogy) you’re the Chief Executive of a business. If you don’t like your director of finance, you have to sue him in the Stockholm Arbitration Institute – you can’t fire him. Question: is he subordinated to you or to someone else? Clearly the subordination here is very strange and confused, and for sure this chap is not acting in your best interests, as you cannot dismiss him from his position by the stroke of a pen.
[I’d like to start with one of your books – ”Rouble Nationalization”. This work of yours is now more relevant than ever, including for the Republic of Moldova. I’d like to ask you to briefly describe how the mechanisms of the US’ financial influence work on our society, on our countries. And why you think Russia should implement such a fundamental financial ... revolution.]
Good afternoon. Thank you for this opportunity to see my book as a kind of ‘underground publication’. That’s very interesting, pleasant and certainly unexpected. These days, by the hand of fate, I am frequently in Moldova, mostly in Chișinău, of course, but I have also traveled around the country quite a lot. I guess in a few Russian cities they might be offended that I visit Chișinău more often than them. That’s just how it has turned out. As for the global financial system, it’s not just about money and the global economy. The understanding of where money comes from, and who creates it, leads to an understanding of what is happening today in global geo-politics. So it really is important. It concerns not only the Russian Federation, Moldova and other nations. In the whole world it’s constructed almost identically. There are two unequal groups of nations. The first group is headed by the US and includes the EU, Japan, Switzerland, UK. They create money out of thin air. This has to be understood. The emission of these magnificent major “hard currencies” takes place without the backing of anything of value. That’s the first thing to know. Secondly, at a certain point, for some reason, the creation of money was transferred from the state to private central banks. The European Central Bank, the Federal Reserve System, the Bank of England – these are non-state organizations, they are shady private outfits. So we have a strange situation where the state has surrendered one of its main functions – the coining of money, which was metal – gold, silver. Now it’s paper money and virtual ones and zeroes on credit cards, but the essence is unchanged: private bankers create money without the backing of any resources. This gives them unlimited power. It gives them access to an unlimited source of wealth, and, accordingly, power. Because for money one can buy corruptible politicians and (in quotation marks) “independent journalists”. One can establish military bases around the world. If the volume of this money is unlimited, then it would seem to bring unlimited power.
[Alright, Nikolai. In the case of Russia, or Moldova, in terms of the Constitution and legislation, the Central Banks are supposedly state institutions.]
Well, you and we, and most nations – the overwhelming majority, belong to the second group of nations, not having the right to sovereign emission of their own currency by the same principle as the first group of nations does. We are forced to accumulate the money created by these private central banks of the so-called “leading” European powers and the US, in order to emit our national currency. This is the so-called “foreign exchange reserves”. In order to create Lei, Roubles or Mexican Pesos, we have to accumulate in certain reserves those digital ones and zeroes, which others simply print out of thin air.
[You mean, our sovereignty is limited, we cannot have our own financial system?]
Of course not. Moreover, in order to obtain _ their _ digital ones and zeroes, we have to give something away to them – they won’t simply give us this money, we have to sell something on the global market. In this way is created a very unequal exchange – the Western nations hand over primarily money they created out of nothing, and in exchange they receive very concrete resources. In the case of Moldova it could be some agricultural products, since, unfortunately, manufacturing has been destroyed in the post-Soviet period. Part of the nation’s sovereignty, a certain voting power at the UN, a certain political position can all be bought for these unbacked digital ones and zeros. In the case of the Russian Federation, a significant part of our natural wealth is likewise sold for this unbacked western money. And only by receiving this money into the foreign exchange reserves of the Central Bank do we get the right to issue our own money. What we have, in fact, is a feudal system of tribute payments cloaked by the financial system. Without paying the tribute, without handing over some of your national wealth effectively for free, most nations of the world don’t have the right to issue money. Hence the difference in the standard of living. Imagine you’re working honestly in some job, doesn’t matter what. Meanwhile someone else is printing money. Which of you will live better?
[That’s obvious. So it means our central banks are independent of the government, the parliament and the president, but are dependent on external factors.]
Absolutely right. They are incorporated into a certain international structure that was set up as a result of the second world war – the IMF. The central banks are a kind of quasi-governmental structure. If you take the Constitution of Russia, Kazakhstan, Belarus, Moldova or other countries, you’ll see there is a very cunning system of subordination. In reality, what exists under the guise of a quasi-governmental structure is subordination to the International Monetary Fund. Imagine, the state cannot liaise directly with the office that creates money. Any conflict which arises has to be resolved in the Stockholm Arbitration Institute.
[So, institutions within the state, it would seem, have to resolve their disputes overseas?]
Imagine (as an analogy) you’re the Chief Executive of a business. If you don’t like your director of finance, you have to sue him in the Stockholm Arbitration Institute – you can’t fire him. Question: is he subordinated to you or to someone else? Clearly the subordination here is very strange and confused, and for sure this chap is not acting in your best interests, as you cannot dismiss him from his position by the stroke of a pen.
Show less
REPLY
6
[PART 2]
[So how about the nationalization of the rouble, the leu, other national currencies in our region? How can we make the breakthrough in practical, legal and constitutional terms? For now we can only talk about it. I don’t think anyone in our region has managed to get out of this situation.]
No-one has ever managed to get out of this situation. Let me emphasize – didn’t get out _ alive _ . Certain politicians, who tried to break the global bankers’ monopoly on the emission of money, got killed. In particular, the US President John F. Kennedy, who was killed after signing the executive order (11110) that the emission of US dollars was to be returned – partially, as a first step – into the hands of the state, and was taken away from the Federal Reserve. After about 4-5 months he was killed by a group of snipers, then the farce was put on with Lee Harvey Oswald, who supposedly shot the President. I won’t go into the details here – anyone can examine the documents and see that it violates not only the laws of logic, but also the laws of physics. For example, the President’s head which was hit by the bullet moves in a clear trajectory in the bullet’s direction of movement – that’s obvious. But in the investigative material it is stated that the shot was fired from the other side. I won’t say that the bullet hovered in the air for a time, since it struck several people on a trajectory that is simply impossible.
[So there is some similarity to the tragic fate of Ceaușescu and Qaddafi – if we take times closer to us.]
Yes, in a certain sense. Both Qaddafi and Ceaușescu are victims of the global financial system, to different degrees. Regarding Ceaușescu, the situation was as follows. Romania during his time borrowed money, which was used to develop Romanian industry. Ceaușescu decided it was necessary to tighten the belt. It was brutal austerity, but as a result, toward the end of his life, Romania re-paid its national debt. But since bankers create money out of nothing, which costs them nothing, their primary task, strange as it may sound, is to put people into debt such that they cannot re-pay it. Why would they need back the money that they can print in any quantity? What they need is the state to borrow money, such that in the future they won’t be able to re-pay it, so they will act according to orders from the bankers, lose their sovereignty, hand over their territory for military bases, and in short, sell out for resources which cost the bankers nothing. Ceaușescu, on the other hand, re-paid the debt. That’s why he was killed as a result of the coup d´état, after which Romania became one of Europe’s main debtors. The current Romanian leadership takes on more debt to the joy of the bankers, while the Romanian people are supposed to repay this debt one day. Of course, it’s a crushing burden. To the ordinary person international politics seems so complicated that it’s impossible to understand anything. That’s an artificially created sense of complexity. In fact, it’s all banal and simple. We understand it all perfectly well. Imagine, when you’re going for some job. Do you choose it because of the freedom, the freedom of speech there? Or because the pay is good?
[Obviously for the good pay.]
But when it’s a question of electing political parties, a certain vector gets pushed upon us, like “freedom”. What exactly is “freedom”? It’s a very abstract concept. Everyone has their own understanding of “freedom”. Once we get onto the specifics of it, we realize that “freedom” can mean anything at all. International politics today is constructed very banally. A few nations, by creating money out of thin air and using the global financial system, pump out all the resources, with which they secure a good standard of living for themselves. Basically, it’s a big pump. IMF, WTO – this is all tools to suck out this standard of living. What is WTO or EU? It’s when they say to a small nation like Moldova: “come into our structure, everyone will trade freely”. Then the trade begins – but from the other side. Huge concerns, which receive credit, now at 0%... Technology isn’t the main thing. It’s 0% finance, or negative rates in Europe, I assume that Moldovan business owners get credit not at 0%.
[It’s 14-16%]
In Russia it’s higher, but still, how is one to compete against huge concerns, which are already up and running and occupy a large share of the market, and could even engage in ‘dumping’ (=capture market share by low prices), and at that they get credit at a negligible rate of interest. Obviously, in normal competition they will eat up local business-owners. And that’s what is happening. WTO is a kind of “market bottle-opener”. It opens up the markets of other nations. Western products flood in. Local producers get washed away and eliminated. Unemployment begins. The state doesn’t receive tax revenues, because all the businesses have closed down. The Western concerns pay where they are registered, or else offshore. As a result, the state has no money, borrows from those same Western countries, and ends up in debt slavery. “You owe us money – do as we say”. Here begins the main issue which we should mention. If a state is very happy with the current world order, then they are interested in its preservation. Their main task is to prevent an alternative power center from emerging, so they can continue to rob the whole world and pump the resources to themselves. At the center of the global economy today is the US. Their main task is to prevent the sovereignization of Europe’s politics. It’s no secret that the policy of the Anglo-Saxons in the course of many centuries – then England, now the US – is a policy of weakening the strongest power in Europe. Today certain states can be nominally called the European Union. The Americans, the English endeavor to keep this organization in check. On the other side, the Russian Federation is restoring its might in the context of the Eurasian Economic Union. If there are calm conditions in Europe, if there is peaceful co-existence, if there is trade and cooperation, then sooner or later it will become obvious that there are no contradictions between the Eurasian Economic Union and the European Union. That’s the first phase. In the second phase some kind of unification might be possible. Our President, V.V.Putin, proposed a united Europe from Lisbon to Vladivostok. For Europeans this is great. But for the Americans it’s deadly. A united continent, united economic and political interests, won’t need the US. What would they need US military bases for, if in Europe there is no longer the threat of war. Therefore, we are coming to a very interesting conclusion: the Americans are interested in the destabilization of Europe, the creation and growth of conflict in Europe.
[So how about the nationalization of the rouble, the leu, other national currencies in our region? How can we make the breakthrough in practical, legal and constitutional terms? For now we can only talk about it. I don’t think anyone in our region has managed to get out of this situation.]
No-one has ever managed to get out of this situation. Let me emphasize – didn’t get out _ alive _ . Certain politicians, who tried to break the global bankers’ monopoly on the emission of money, got killed. In particular, the US President John F. Kennedy, who was killed after signing the executive order (11110) that the emission of US dollars was to be returned – partially, as a first step – into the hands of the state, and was taken away from the Federal Reserve. After about 4-5 months he was killed by a group of snipers, then the farce was put on with Lee Harvey Oswald, who supposedly shot the President. I won’t go into the details here – anyone can examine the documents and see that it violates not only the laws of logic, but also the laws of physics. For example, the President’s head which was hit by the bullet moves in a clear trajectory in the bullet’s direction of movement – that’s obvious. But in the investigative material it is stated that the shot was fired from the other side. I won’t say that the bullet hovered in the air for a time, since it struck several people on a trajectory that is simply impossible.
[So there is some similarity to the tragic fate of Ceaușescu and Qaddafi – if we take times closer to us.]
Yes, in a certain sense. Both Qaddafi and Ceaușescu are victims of the global financial system, to different degrees. Regarding Ceaușescu, the situation was as follows. Romania during his time borrowed money, which was used to develop Romanian industry. Ceaușescu decided it was necessary to tighten the belt. It was brutal austerity, but as a result, toward the end of his life, Romania re-paid its national debt. But since bankers create money out of nothing, which costs them nothing, their primary task, strange as it may sound, is to put people into debt such that they cannot re-pay it. Why would they need back the money that they can print in any quantity? What they need is the state to borrow money, such that in the future they won’t be able to re-pay it, so they will act according to orders from the bankers, lose their sovereignty, hand over their territory for military bases, and in short, sell out for resources which cost the bankers nothing. Ceaușescu, on the other hand, re-paid the debt. That’s why he was killed as a result of the coup d´état, after which Romania became one of Europe’s main debtors. The current Romanian leadership takes on more debt to the joy of the bankers, while the Romanian people are supposed to repay this debt one day. Of course, it’s a crushing burden. To the ordinary person international politics seems so complicated that it’s impossible to understand anything. That’s an artificially created sense of complexity. In fact, it’s all banal and simple. We understand it all perfectly well. Imagine, when you’re going for some job. Do you choose it because of the freedom, the freedom of speech there? Or because the pay is good?
[Obviously for the good pay.]
But when it’s a question of electing political parties, a certain vector gets pushed upon us, like “freedom”. What exactly is “freedom”? It’s a very abstract concept. Everyone has their own understanding of “freedom”. Once we get onto the specifics of it, we realize that “freedom” can mean anything at all. International politics today is constructed very banally. A few nations, by creating money out of thin air and using the global financial system, pump out all the resources, with which they secure a good standard of living for themselves. Basically, it’s a big pump. IMF, WTO – this is all tools to suck out this standard of living. What is WTO or EU? It’s when they say to a small nation like Moldova: “come into our structure, everyone will trade freely”. Then the trade begins – but from the other side. Huge concerns, which receive credit, now at 0%... Technology isn’t the main thing. It’s 0% finance, or negative rates in Europe, I assume that Moldovan business owners get credit not at 0%.
[It’s 14-16%]
In Russia it’s higher, but still, how is one to compete against huge concerns, which are already up and running and occupy a large share of the market, and could even engage in ‘dumping’ (=capture market share by low prices), and at that they get credit at a negligible rate of interest. Obviously, in normal competition they will eat up local business-owners. And that’s what is happening. WTO is a kind of “market bottle-opener”. It opens up the markets of other nations. Western products flood in. Local producers get washed away and eliminated. Unemployment begins. The state doesn’t receive tax revenues, because all the businesses have closed down. The Western concerns pay where they are registered, or else offshore. As a result, the state has no money, borrows from those same Western countries, and ends up in debt slavery. “You owe us money – do as we say”. Here begins the main issue which we should mention. If a state is very happy with the current world order, then they are interested in its preservation. Their main task is to prevent an alternative power center from emerging, so they can continue to rob the whole world and pump the resources to themselves. At the center of the global economy today is the US. Their main task is to prevent the sovereignization of Europe’s politics. It’s no secret that the policy of the Anglo-Saxons in the course of many centuries – then England, now the US – is a policy of weakening the strongest power in Europe. Today certain states can be nominally called the European Union. The Americans, the English endeavor to keep this organization in check. On the other side, the Russian Federation is restoring its might in the context of the Eurasian Economic Union. If there are calm conditions in Europe, if there is peaceful co-existence, if there is trade and cooperation, then sooner or later it will become obvious that there are no contradictions between the Eurasian Economic Union and the European Union. That’s the first phase. In the second phase some kind of unification might be possible. Our President, V.V.Putin, proposed a united Europe from Lisbon to Vladivostok. For Europeans this is great. But for the Americans it’s deadly. A united continent, united economic and political interests, won’t need the US. What would they need US military bases for, if in Europe there is no longer the threat of war. Therefore, we are coming to a very interesting conclusion: the Americans are interested in the destabilization of Europe, the creation and growth of conflict in Europe.
Show less
REPLY
6
thank very very much !!!
REPLY
No comments:
Post a Comment